• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Pacific Medical Law

A founding member of BILA

Law, Justice And Compassion | Call Today

1-604-685-2361

  • Home
  • Team
  • Injuries
    • Birth Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Infant & Child Injuries
    • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Janna Epp Bursary
  • Cases Won
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • For Lawyers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Team
  • Injuries
    • Birth Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Infant & Child Injuries
    • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Janna Epp Bursary
  • Cases Won
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • For Lawyers
  • Contact
Call
Contact
Blog

Archives for September 2020

Sailing to New Heights

Friday, September 18, 2020 By Admin

This November, Natasha Lambert will be embarking on her biggest challenge yet – sailing across the Atlantic Ocean.

Natasha’s love of sailing was immediate. It started on a lake in England when she was nine years old and only grew stronger as she got involved with a local sailing academy back home on the Isle of Wight. However, because Natasha was born with athetoid cerebral palsy and is unable to use her hands, she could not sail the boats herself.  Nevertheless, she was determined to find a way to sail independently. 

In 2009, Natasha’s parents gave her a life-changing gift – a converted model yacht which allowed her full control using her mouth and a ‘sip and puff’ system – assistive technology that uses air pressure to send signals to a device through the user by inhaling (sipping) or exhaling (puffing) through a straw in the user’s mouth.  The sip and puff system works by using one short sip of breath to move starboard (right), quick puffs to turn port (left) and a click of the tongue to control the sails. This system is described as “life-changing” by her mother.

This got Natasha thinking – if she was able to control a model boat, why not a real one?

The following year, Natasha’s family bought a real sailboat and her father Gary spent the next 6 months installing and testing a sip and puff system that he had designed himself in order for Natasha to have full control of the yacht. Their hope is to one day have this same system commercially manufactured to enable others with disabilities to sail.

Since then, Natasha has led many sailing trips which have raised money for charity, including for the charity she helped create, The MissIsle School. This charity provides affordable sailing tuition to young people with physical disabilities who would benefit from the sip and puff method of sailing. She was even awarded the British Empire Medal in 2015 as recognition of her fundraising achievements. 

This past July, now 23-year-old Natasha set sail from Cowes, Isle of Wight, to Gibraltar to begin the first leg of her transatlantic voyage on her newly adapted boat, Blown Away, in the hopes of raising £30,000 (approximately $50,000 Canadian) for charity. Although COVID-19 restrictions initially presented as a challenge, the rest of her incredible journey is still scheduled to begin in November.

Natasha’s journey, like those we have celebrated in our previous blogs, highlights the amazing potential of children living with disabilities when provided with sufficient support and adaptive equipment to reach their true potential.  At Pacific Medical Law, it is our mission to help children living with cerebral palsy achieve their full potential by providing them with fair compensation for their disability when it was caused or contributed to through medical negligence.  We are here to help. Call us for a free consultation – we can provide information about supports and resources in your community as well as legal advice regarding your child’s rights for financial compensation. 

Filed Under: Cerebral Palsy, Cerebral Palsy Association of BC, Health News

No place like home? Thinking twice about midwife-assisted planned home births

Thursday, September 10, 2020 By Arash Adjudani

Over the past two decades, the number of out-of-hospital births has been on the rise in British Columbia.  This includes home births, which can be performed by registered midwives or appropriately trained physicians. 

But are home births safe?  It depends.

A recent US study investigated this question.  By analyzing the rates of neonatal mortality in births attended by certified nurse-midwives, the study found that home births had significantly higher rates of neonatal mortality, even for mothers with a low risk profile. These results are not surprising; when unexpected complications occur during labour, hospitals are much better equipped in providing immediate and life-saving intervention for both mother and fetus. 

In Canada, birth statistics suggest that hospital births are far safer than non-hospital births.  In 2018, for example, non-hospital births were 4.5 times more likely to result in fetal death compared to hospital births.  These numbers, however, do not distinguish between high-risk and low-risk pregnancies.  In fact, studies have shown that midwife-attended home births for low-risk pregnancies are as safe as hospital births, according to the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC).  As such, the current SOGC guideline supports a woman’s choice for a planned home birth, given that she is fully informed of all risks and benefits, and provided that “the birth is anticipated to be uncomplicated”.

To return to the question posed earlier, childbirth is an inherently risky process. For this reason, obstetrical procedures carry the highest rates of medical insurance premiums in Canada.  Strictly speaking, therefore, no child birth is ‘safe’ because every delivery, no matter how ‘routine’, can potentially result in catastrophic and life-altering birth injuries to the baby, including cerebral palsy and other types of brain damage.

With this in mind, any woman who is considering a planned home birth by a midwife is well advised to familiarize herself with the Standards & Policies that regulate the scope of practice of midwives in British Columbia. 

A number of important factors must be considered to ensure the safety of a planned home birth.  First, a midwife has a duty to determine if the pregnancy poses a risk to the pregnant mother and/or the fetus, and whether or not the pregnant mother is an appropriate candidate for a planned home birth. There is a long list of conditions that may preclude a midwife from attending a home birth. These conditions may be present early on in the pregnancy, or they may develop at any time throughout the pregnancy or during labour. In those cases, the midwife is required to transfer the care of the client to a physician, which would require immediate transport to hospital if the labour was underway at home. Likewise, similar criteria exist with respect to water births.  Second, a midwife has a duty to develop a written and detailed plan for a home birth. This plan should include an assessment of the home environment as a suitable birthing place.  The midwife is also required to have the necessary equipment and supplies for home birth, as well as a comprehensive transport plan to the nearest hospital in case of an emergency.  Finally, and most importantly, the midwife has a duty to obtain the client’s informed consent. In doing so, not only must the midwife discuss with the client any theoretical risks, but the midwife must also keep the client informed and updated regarding any unanticipated problems that arise at any stage of the pregnancy, including during labour.

The bottom line: 

Midwife-assisted planned home births are a relatively safe option for a certain group of low-risk pregnancies, as described by the CMBA guidelines. In obtaining the client’s informed consent for a home birth, the midwife has a duty to determine the risk profile of the pregnancy and appropriateness of the client for a home birth, to clearly communicate and discuss those risks with the client and to develop a detailed plan, including an emergency transport plan.  Most importantly, the midwife must be ready to promptly transfer the care of the patient to a physician when complications arise that exceed his or her scope of practice, or when requested by the pregnant mother.

If you have questions or concerns about your home birth experience, we are here to help.  We work in collaboration with a team of lawyers, physicians, midwives and nurses.  We will take the time to listen to your concerns, and carefully review your medical care in order to answer your questions. Please contact us for a free consultation.    

Filed Under: Cerebral Palsy, Health News

A new study finds hope in a blood test – helping babies born with brain injuries

Friday, September 4, 2020 By Admin

A recent study gives new parents hope following the heartbreak that comes with hearing your baby has suffered a brain injury.

Scientists have found that a simple blood test might be a way to identify if your baby is at higher risk for a poor outcome following a birth-related brain injury – also known as neonatal encephalopathy.

Neonatal encephalopathy associated with oxygen deprivation in the weeks before, during, and after birth is the most common cause of death and brain damage in full term babies. Identifying at-risk babies sooner means faster treatment, which could protect them from some of the worst damage triggered by this kind of injury.

There are a number of other causes for neonatal encephalopathy and these include inflammatory processes, infections, metabolic and genetic causes. The outcome of all these sources look very much the same to you – your baby has a brain injury and there might not be a clear answer as to why. Given so many possible reasons for your baby’s injury, it might be difficult to get appropriate treatment. If the findings in this study are confirmed, it means hope of a better future for you and your baby.

Working with whole blood samples taken within six hours of birth from 45 babies with neonatal encephalopathy, the researchers analyzed the babies’ Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) with new generation sequencing. The babies were reassessed at 18 months of age and the RNA sequences of babies with worse outcomes were compared with the RNA sequences of babies with better outcomes.

Looking at the changes in RNA sequences between these two baby groups, researchers discovered that the same genes were working differently. The study revealed when, what kinds, and how much of each protein was being made in the babies’ cells. Some of these proteins were found to be harmful and some of them to be helpful. Babies with the worst outcomes made more of the bad proteins and less of the good ones.

Out of the 855 genes that were discovered to be most different between the two baby groups – two specific genes, RGS1 and SMC4, were identified as showing the most differences as well as being predictors of a worse outcome.

Knowing what genes are involved in poorer outcomes and the ability to identify these genes soon after birth, may mean the hope of faster and improved treatment for your baby with neonatal encephalopathy. 

In all the good news, there are some cautions that come with these findings. The scientists were not necessarily looking for what they found and there weren’t many babies in the study. This means that the evidence is not quite as good as it might be and may not be duplicated in a larger more focused study.

However, it is still a hopeful finding and if you are a parent with a brain-injured baby – hope is good.

Click here to read the study

Filed Under: Health News

Racism, Maternal Deaths and Healthcare Inequality

Thursday, September 3, 2020 By Letty Condon

More than 2 months have passed since the death of George Floyd.  During this time, there have been efforts on an international scale to acknowledge racial injustice and reform systems which allow or encourage racism to persist.  In healthcare, data from the CDC has revealed the startling differences between the risk of dying in pregnancy faced by non-Hispanic black women in the United States when compared to all women in pregnancy.  More recently, data also from the CDC has shown that two thirds of deaths related to pregnancy were considered to be preventable.  In Canada, the story of the preventable death of Brian Sinclair, an Indigenous man who died in a hospital room, shocked the nation in 2008.  Despite more than 10 years having passed since his death, there are examples that Indigenous Peoples face inequitable access to healthcare and racism.

The CDC has recently published data received from 14 Maternal Mortality Review Committees  (MMRCs) who were able to review information related to the health and social factors that affect pregnant women.  Between 2008 and 2017, information related to the deaths of the 1,347 women who died during pregnancy or within a year of delivery was analysed. These committees found that the deaths could have been prevented in two thirds of the cases.  The percentage of deaths that were considered to be preventable did not vary significantly between women of different ethnicities.  However, the data published by the CDC in 2019 shows that the risk of dying during pregnancy or within a year of giving birth for non-Hispanic black women was 40.8 per 100,000 births, 29.7 per 100,000 births for non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native women, and overall the mortality rate was 16.7 per 100,000 births.

So why is there a difference in the risk of dying between women of different ethnic backgrounds?  Research has shown that the difference may be partly related to medical conditions that ethnic minority women are more vulnerable to.  However, this biological basis is less clear as there is also a significant difference in the access to healthcare these women have and the quality of care provided is significantly lower.  These differences can influence the impact that any pre-existing medical condition or vulnerability to illness has. 

Racial discrimination may also contribute to the severity of the condition.  For example, death related to high blood pressure in pregnancy was shown in the research by the CDC to affect proportionally more black women than white women.  A study has shown that high blood pressure is more common among those of black ethnicity than white and those who have high blood pressure are more likely to have suffered racism.  Therefore, genetic differences may contribute less than discriminatory attitudes and systems.

These inequalities on the basis of race exist internationally.  Research looking at maternity care in the U.K. has shown that the rates of death faced by women during pregnancy or in the weeks after birth are five times higher for those of Black ethnic backgrounds and twice as high for those of Asian ethnic backgrounds when compared to white women.   Indigenous peoples in New Zealand and Australia face delays in accessing the lifesaving investigation and treatment of heart disease.  

The case of Brian Sinclair in 2008 highlighted the issue of healthcare inequality in Canada, where an Indigenous man with cognitive impairment was left without medical care and attention in the waiting room of an ER for 34 hours.  An interim report looking into his death, published in 2017, identified that Mr. Sinclair was ignored as a result of racism and lack of care for an Indigenous person.  Another report from 2017 reviewed cases in a Saskatoon Health Region hospital where Aboriginal women (this being the way the women described themselves) were coerced into having a surgical sterilization procedure following childbirth.  Jordan River Anderson was a First Nations child born with complex medical needs in Manitoba.  He spent more than 2 years unnecessarily in hospital awaiting a financial decision about the funding for his home care because he was a First Nations child.  He died in hospital without spending a day in his family home.

There are ongoing efforts to address racism in healthcare and physicians in Canada are encouraged to develop their understanding of the barriers faced by those of racial minority groups. There are also physician groups which advocate with and on behalf of affected communities.  There are plans to address healthcare inequalities through Jordan’s Principle and the Inuit Child First Initiative. 

The extent to which these initiatives lead to significant changes in the provision of healthcare in Canada remains uncertain. What is certain, however, is that healthcare providers are required as a matter of law, to provide all patients with safe and appropriate medical care regardless of the patient’s racial or ethnic background.  Moreover, positive steps are required to ensure that equitable treatment and care is received by those of racial minority groups.

Filed Under: Health News, Legal News, Medical Malpractice

Primary Sidebar

  • Birth Injury
  • Brain Injury
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Infant & Child Injuries
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Janna Epp Bursary

Categories

  • Accessibility (24)
  • Adult Injuries (25)
  • Cerebral Palsy (62)
  • Cerebral Palsy Association of BC (26)
  • Community Involvement (31)
  • Firm News (55)
  • Health News (67)
  • Legal News (25)
  • Medical Malpractice (34)
  • People with Disabilities (29)
  • The Verdict – Law Journal (23)
  • Understanding Birth Injuries (1)

Archives

  • March 2023 (1)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • September 2022 (3)
  • January 2022 (2)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • June 2021 (4)
  • April 2021 (2)
  • March 2021 (2)
  • February 2021 (3)
  • December 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (4)
  • August 2020 (4)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (5)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (4)
  • December 2019 (3)
  • October 2019 (3)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (3)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (3)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (2)
  • January 2019 (5)
  • December 2018 (3)
  • November 2018 (3)
  • October 2018 (4)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (8)
  • July 2018 (8)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (24)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • February 2018 (4)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • July 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (1)
  • October 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (5)
  • August 2013 (2)
  • July 2013 (1)
  • June 2013 (7)

Recent Posts

  • Standard of Care in Birth Injury Cases
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Acquired Brain Injuries
  • Surgical Negligence

How Can We Help You?

Contact Us

Footer

Our Office Location

Pacific Medical Law 1030 6th Avenue West Vancouver, BC V6H 1A3
Toll Free: 1-888-333-2361 Phone: 604-685-2361 Map & Directions

Copyright © 2022 Sitemap