Standard of Care

Source: The Verdict, Issue 165 / Summer 2020
Author: Brenda Osmond 
The Verdict issue 165

This is the third article in our 8 part series on medical malpractice litigation.  The law does not expect health care professionals to provide the highest level of care, or to meet a gold standard in providing care.  They are expected to exercise the reasonable degree of care that would be expected of a normal, prudent practitioner.  In this article, Brenda Osmond reviews how the courts determine that standard, and whether or not there is room for common sense in assessing the standard of care.

Share this article

Publications

Recent Publications

Complexities of the Medical Malpractice Jury Trial

Does Failure to Disclose a Medical Error Amount to Liability?

Medical Malpractice: Expert Evidence – The New Normal

Causation – Application: The Difficulties Associated with Applying the “But For” Test

Causation – Basic Principles: The Murky Waters of Causation in Medical Negligence

Defenses to a Medical Malpractice Claim – Navigating the Minefield

Standard of Care

The Evolution of the Law of Informed Consent