Foreseeability and Risk of Harm in a Standard of Care Assessment

Source: The Verdict – Issue 189 / Summer 2026
Author: Lindsay McGivern, Pacific Medical Law
Foreseeability and Risk of Harm in a Standard of Care Assessment publication cover

This is the seventh article of our series discussing practical and evidentiary issues in medical malpractice. Each article will examine recent medical malpractice case law and focus on the practical and evidentiary issues within them. The goal is to provide some useful insight into the obstacles that occurred in hopes that future cases can adapt and develop new ways to overcome these challenges. In this article, Lindsay McGivern explores how the concepts of forseeability and risk of harm in a standard of care assessment have directed outcomes in recent medical malpractice cases.

Share this article

Publications

Recent Publications

Foreseeability and Risk of Harm in a Standard of Care Assessment

Causation in Medical Malpractice Cases: A Quarter-Century Review

The Duty to Warn – When Can a Physician Breach Patient Confidentiality to Protect a Third party?

Ontario Reforms Spark Medical Malpractice Backlash

Digital Scribes, Legal Signatures: AI-Generated Records in Medical Malpractice

Caught on Camera: The Impact of Photo and Video Evidence in Surgical Negligence Cases

Defining the Standard of Care: When Will a Generalist be Held to a Standard Approaching that of a Specialist?

The Impact of Contemporaneous Medical Records on Credibility Disputes