The Duty to Warn – When Can a Physician Breach Patient Confidentiality to Protect a Third party?

Source: The Verdict – Issue 187 / Winter 2025
Author: Andrea Donaldson, Pacific Medical Law
The Verdict Winter 2025

This is the fifth article of our series discussing practical and evidentiary issues in medical malpractice. Each article will examine recent medical malpractice case law and focus on the practical and evidentiary issues within them. The goal is to provide some useful insight into the obstacles that occurred in hopes that future cases can adapt and develop new ways to overcome these challenges. In this article, Andrea Donaldson discusses when the interest in public safety overrides physician-patient confidentiality and examines how the “duty to warn” has been approached by the courts over the years.

Share this article

Publications

Recent Publications

Causation in Medical Malpractice Cases: A Quarter-Century Review

The Duty to Warn – When Can a Physician Breach Patient Confidentiality to Protect a Third party?

Ontario Reforms Spark Medical Malpractice Backlash

Digital Scribes, Legal Signatures: AI-Generated Records in Medical Malpractice

Caught on Camera: The Impact of Photo and Video Evidence in Surgical Negligence Cases

Defining the Standard of Care: When Will a Generalist be Held to a Standard Approaching that of a Specialist?

The Impact of Contemporaneous Medical Records on Credibility Disputes

Care Planning in Medical Malpractice: Making the Case for In-Home Care