Standard of Care

Source: The Verdict, Issue 165 / Summer 2020
Author: Brenda Osmond 
The Verdict issue 165

This is the third article in our 8 part series on medical malpractice litigation.  The law does not expect health care professionals to provide the highest level of care, or to meet a gold standard in providing care.  They are expected to exercise the reasonable degree of care that would be expected of a normal, prudent practitioner.  In this article, Brenda Osmond reviews how the courts determine that standard, and whether or not there is room for common sense in assessing the standard of care.

Share this article

Publications

Recent Publications

Ontario reforms spark medical malpractice backlash

Digital Scribes, Legal Signatures: AI-Generated Records in Medical Malpractice

Caught on Camera: The Impact of Photo and Video Evidence in Surgical Negligence Cases

Defining the Standard of Care: When Will a Generalist be Held to a Standard Approaching that of a Specialist?

The Impact of Contemporaneous Medical Records on Credibility Disputes

Care Planning in Medical Malpractice: Making the Case for In-Home Care

Interprofessional Communication in Medicine

Delayed Diagnosis