Proving Causation in Birth Trauma Cases: Navigating the Twilight Zone Between Factual and Legal Causation 

Source: The Verdict, Issue 136 / Spring 2013
Author: Natalia Ivolgina & Paul McGivern
The Verdict, Issue 136 / Spring 2013

The Canadian Medical Protective Association is the primary insurer for Canadian physicians faced with medical malpractice lawsuits. The Association’s 2011 Annual Report indicates that out of 894 civil action cases closed that year, 293 settled out of court (approximately one-third). Of the legal actions that proceeded to trial, 13 judgments were rendered for the plaintiff (patient) and 55 for the defendant (doctor). According to Professor Russell Brown most plaintiffs fail in medical negligence cases because they are unable to prove that the medical professional’s negligence caused the plaintiff’s injury. As this paper will examine, this is especially true in birth trauma cases, where proving causation is often the most trying and costly part of the case.

Share this article

Publications

Recent Publications

Ontario reforms spark medical malpractice backlash

Digital Scribes, Legal Signatures: AI-Generated Records in Medical Malpractice

Caught on Camera: The Impact of Photo and Video Evidence in Surgical Negligence Cases

Defining the Standard of Care: When Will a Generalist be Held to a Standard Approaching that of a Specialist?

The Impact of Contemporaneous Medical Records on Credibility Disputes

Care Planning in Medical Malpractice: Making the Case for In-Home Care

Interprofessional Communication in Medicine

Delayed Diagnosis