Defining the Standard of Care: When Will a Generalist be Held to a Standard Approaching that of a Specialist?

Source: The Verdict – Issue 184 / Spring 2025
Author: Andrea Donaldson, Pacific Medical Law
The verdict cover

This is the second article of our series discussing practical and evidentiary issues in medical malpractice. Each article will examine recent medical malpractice case law and focus on practical and evidentiary issues, with the goal of providing some useful insight into the obstacles that occurred in hopes that future cases can adapt and develop new ways to overcome these challenges. In this article, Andrea Donaldson reviews cases in which generalists have been held to higher standards than their formal training would suggest, and offers suggestions for counsel to illustrate the required standard of care to the court.

Share this article

Publications

Recent Publications

Ontario reforms spark medical malpractice backlash

Digital Scribes, Legal Signatures: AI-Generated Records in Medical Malpractice

Caught on Camera: The Impact of Photo and Video Evidence in Surgical Negligence Cases

Defining the Standard of Care: When Will a Generalist be Held to a Standard Approaching that of a Specialist?

The Impact of Contemporaneous Medical Records on Credibility Disputes

Care Planning in Medical Malpractice: Making the Case for In-Home Care

Interprofessional Communication in Medicine

Delayed Diagnosis